Meningen

The large number of characters from the beginning in the film and dialogue-oriented actions may make us repeat to ourselves how the time of 129 minutes of the film passes? But as the film progresses, we encounter a wonderful film and the director of the film "Mike Lee" once again shows off his skills. We are witnessing a live and believable movie. This movie depicts the daily life of a family and their close people in four seasons.

Watching a movie for 144 minutes and not feeling tired at the end and enjoying watching the movie is definitely a sign of a great filmmaker. Brian De Palma is great as Carlito. The scenes are arranged with care and elegance. The mise-en-scène, filming and editing are excellent. The film editing model is an educational class for those interested in cinema. The sequence of the train station and escalators is reminiscent of the movie "untouchables". De Palma and Al Pacino working together again is spectacular. "Sean Penn" has a unique game and is a candidate for this role. Overall, watching the movie is admirable and enjoyable.

Celine and Julie Go Boating

The movie is from 1974 and today, few viewers have the patience to watch a movie for 194 minutes, that's why mini-series and series have gained a lot of fans. The film is remarkable in terms of narrative and original art. The cinematic references in the movie are interesting and the acting of the actors (Celine and Julie) is good. The film is about friendship and how two people become friends in a modern city of Paris. In addition to this friendship, the film pays attention to the concept of modernity, and therefore this friendship in its depth becomes the change of identity of two friends in modern daily life.

First of all, the performance of "Kseniya Rappoport" in the role of Sofia is remarkable. The strong point of the film is avoiding extremism to attract the audience in the manner of cinematic techniques that are seen in most films in this genre. The film consciously avoids emotionalizing the audience. It does not give slogans of moralism. The end of the movie is different and good. Moreover, the soundtrack of the film is well.

The film has a different, thought-provoking and bold theme and this is a promising point. But choosing the subject of all cinema. This film has a problem with the narrative and this is a neural and superficial film. It is acceptable to show it at the Sundance Festival, but it is a question for me to be nominated for the jury and I would like to know the reason.

As the director's first film, it can be considered an acceptable and average film. Katie Aselton, American director/actress, in her first film, it shows courage. film shows a 30-year-old couple who have reached an impasse in their sexual relationship and are looking to break free from it. They use the worst method and in this disgusting way they get to trust and believe each other. Aselton's performance in the role of Annie is remarkable and the choice of the male actor for this role was also well done by the director. The film tries to approach realism in its structure, and the closer we get to the end of the film, the dullness of the film decreases. In general, the film does not grab the heart and the boldness of the director is its highlight.

Comedy is always dependent on culture and geography. "Judo" is not an exception to this rule and the subject of the film, the child of reading, is a current and delicate subject. The strong point of the movie can be considered its good script. "Diablo Cody was first persuaded by the film's producer, Mason Novick, who had already signed him for his memoir, to write a screenplay beforehand, which became Juno". He was able to get the Oscar for the best non-adapted screenplay for this film.

The third film of the Millennium trilogy is a crime thriller that was generally well received and received moderate reviews and has its own charms.

The beginning of the movie is exactly from the end of the movie "The Girl Who Plays with Fire" and this idea is attractive and pleasant.

When we consider the total of three films together in a trilogy, we can consider it an attractive, different and successful trilogy of Swedish cinema.

A crime/psycho thriller based on an adaptation of a novel that the director does well in this difficult film. This film is one of the films of recent years, after which two films were made in the continuation of this film. This movie has received a lot of attention and is suitable for those interested in the psychology of cinema. The soundtrack tries to create an atmosphere of dread and although it succeeds in this, the soundtrack seems to be overdone.

The subject of the film and Henry VIII's marriage has been the subject of many films and series. This movie is smooth in telling the story and it does it well.

Although the movie has a good theme. A new and bold topic that is worth thinking about, but the film is weak in its structure and in the way it presents the concept. All the movie sequences are clichéd and predictable. I think the choice of comedy genre is due to the lack of courage of the creators.

A good movie is both enjoyable to watch and a movie that is noticed and stays in the mind. An unpretentious but powerful drama with a unique performance by both main actors, which shows a tactful direction. One of the attractive points of the film is the direction and cinematography. Another good point of the movie is the few dialogues, but appropriate. The film is a story of loneliness and alienation of people in today's life.

This movie is the weakest work I have seen from "Atom Egoyan". The film is confused in its narrative, although the topic of the film is so labyrinthine that it can stand until the end.

Overall, it is a suitable film for entertainment. The characterization is not good and it seems to be one of those adaptation films where the original source is much better and more attractive than the film. For his fans, this film is influenced by the director of Armenian descent, and his shadow has fallen on the film.